SHOP STEWARD GENERAL CHECKLIST
- 1) Was there sufficient PROOF or was management's action based on hearsay?
- 2) Did management INVESTIGATE AND VERIFY the charge BEFORE taking action or did they "shoot from the hip" first and investigate after the fact?
- a) Did grievant get "his day in court"?
- b) Was management's charge premature?
3) Did management selectively STACK THE DECK by over emphasizing certain facts and points (perhaps taken out of context) while playing-down those factors which would favor the grievant so as to belatedly justify a charge?
- 4) Did management OVER-REACT (i.e.: react drastically or emotionally rather than objectively?)
- 5) Was the discipline PUNITIVE and VINDICTIVE rather than CORRECTIVE and REMEDIAL?
- 6) Was the discipline timely?
- a) Did it follow the alleged commission or omission within a logical and reasonable time?
- b) Did management wait until an incident occurred before suddenly clamping down?
- 7) Was the penalty consistent with the principle of PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE?
- 8) Was the grievant adequately INFORMED as to what level of PERFORMANCE OR COMPLIANCE would be expected of him or her?
- 9) Did the penalty violate any applicable and relevant provision of:
- • An addendum to the Agreement
- • A Supplementary Letter of Understanding (side Letter)
- • A policy
- • An Administrative Directive
- • A past practice
- • An applicable and relevant arbitration award
- • An applicable law
* Or was the penalty arbitrary, capricious, unjust, unfair, unreasonable, inequitable, or discriminatory?
* Or did the penalty otherwise adversely affect the welfare of the grievant, Union or the individual or the collective rights of the employees in the bargaining unit?
- 10) Did management apply it's rules, orders and penalties EVEN-HANDEDLY?
- 11) Did management punish EVERYONE for the infractions and deficiencies of a FEW?
- 12) Did management MAKE KNOWN to the Grievant prior to disciplinary him, what the RULE was that they charged him with violating?